Unlocking the Future: Boulder's Airport DilemmaCommunity members on both sides of the debate over the future of Boulder's municipal airport are voicing their concerns about a long-awaited financial analysis released by city officials. The analysis explores two scenarios - keeping the airport open indefinitely or decommissioning it by 2041 when the city's contract with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) expires. However, both pro- and anti-airport groups have found issues with the city's proposals, raising questions about the airport's economic impact, environmental concerns, and the feasibility of closure.

Navigating the Complexities of Boulder's Airport Debate

Balancing Economic Interests and Environmental Concerns

The financial analysis presented by city staffers has sparked a heated debate within the community. On one side, housing advocates see the airport's 180-acre site as a prime opportunity to address the city's pressing need for affordable housing. They have advanced two ballot measures for the upcoming election, aiming to close the airport and redevelop the land. Nearby residents have also raised concerns about excessive airport noise and potential lead contamination from the leaded fuel used in aircraft.On the other hand, a vocal contingent of community members, including pilots and aviation enthusiasts, argue that the airport is an economic engine for the city, creating jobs and generating revenue. The Boulder Chamber has opposed closing the airport, citing its "significant economic vitality, transportation, and public safety benefits" as reasons to keep it open.

Navigating Legal and Financial Obstacles

The debate over the airport's future is further complicated by legal and financial considerations. Boulder is currently locked in a contract with the FAA to keep the airport operating for at least the next 18 years, as the city has accepted FAA grant funding. The FAA has reiterated that Boulder is obligated to maintain the airport's operations, and the city's federal obligations extend in perpetuity "unless released by the federal government."Former Boulder District Attorney Stan Garnett, writing on behalf of the Boulder Airport Association, has opined that "it would be extremely expensive and very difficult, if not impossible, to decommission the airport" based on the FAA's position. This legal and financial hurdle has become a significant obstacle for those advocating for the airport's closure.

Exploring Alternative Scenarios and Funding Sources

The city's financial analysis presented two scenarios: keeping the airport open indefinitely or decommissioning it by 2041. However, both pro- and anti-airport groups have found issues with these proposals.The Airport Neighborhood Campaign, the group behind the ballot measures to close the airport, has expressed alarm at the city's scenarios, which they believe would lead to the growth and expansion of the airport's facilities, exacerbating noise, pollution, and carbon emissions. They have urged the city to explore a new scenario that does not involve the expansion of airport operations or increase the cost burden on the city.Conversely, the Soaring Society of Boulder has criticized the city's proposals, arguing that they would worsen the airport's environmental impact and that the airport has been "self-sustaining" without requiring subsidies from the city's general fund. The group has suggested that the city investigate a third scenario where the airport remains operational without drawing from the general fund and prioritizes investments to reduce noise and environmental impacts.Councilmember Matthew Benjamin has also questioned the assumption that the city would need to increase airport spending if the airport were to remain open, asking city staffers to explore a scenario where the airport stays operational at a similar level to the status quo.

Seeking Public Input and Transparency

The Airport Neighborhood Campaign has urged the city council to take public input on the airport's future and not make a decision until after the November election, when voters will have the opportunity to weigh in. The group has expressed concern that there was no opportunity for public comment at the recent City Council meeting where the airport's future was discussed.As the debate continues, it is clear that the city must carefully consider the diverse perspectives and concerns of the community, while also navigating the complex legal and financial landscape surrounding the airport's future. Ultimately, the decision will have far-reaching implications for Boulder's residents, economy, and environment, and it will require a delicate balance of competing interests and a commitment to transparency and public engagement.